Re: [PATCH, Darwin, config] Arrange for configure to detect "otool".

On 8/30/18 9:45 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Currently, we fail to detect some Darwin assembler capabilities because the > configure tests rely on a BINUTILS objdump, which isn’t generally available > on Darwin. > > Darwin uses a tool called "otool" to provide information about objects, and we > shoul

Re: [PATCH, Darwin, config] Arrange for configure to detect "otool".

On Aug 30, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Currently, we fail to detect some Darwin assembler capabilities because the > configure tests rely on a BINUTILS objdump, which isn’t generally available > on Darwin. > > Darwin uses a tool called "otool" to provide information about objects, a

Re: [PATCH, Darwin, config] Arrange for configure to detect "otool".

Hi Iain, > Currently, we fail to detect some Darwin assembler capabilities because the > configure tests rely on a BINUTILS objdump, which isn’t generally available > on Darwin. > > Darwin uses a tool called "otool" to provide information about objects, and we > should be able to extend or adapt c

[PATCH, Darwin, config] Arrange for configure to detect "otool".

Currently, we fail to detect some Darwin assembler capabilities because the configure tests rely on a BINUTILS objdump, which isn’t generally available on Darwin. Darwin uses a tool called "otool" to provide information about objects, and we should be able to extend or adapt config tests to use th