Re: [PATCH, Atom] Fix performance regression with -mtune=atom

2011-10-14 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote: > Patch is attached. > > Thanks, > Vladimir > > 2011-10-14  Yakovlev Vladimir  vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com ^ Should be in "<>". > >     * gcc/config/i386/i386.c (atom_cost): Changed cost for loading

Re: [PATCH, Atom] Fix performance regression with -mtune=atom

2011-10-14 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote: > Could anyone checkin that? Please provide a suitable patch which can be applied. H.J. > Thanks, > Vladimir > > 2011/10/14 Uros Bizjak : >> Hello! >> >>> This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it >>> really gi

Re: [PATCH, Atom] Fix performance regression with -mtune=atom

2011-10-14 Thread Vladimir Yakovlev
Could anyone checkin that? Thanks, Vladimir 2011/10/14 Uros Bizjak : > Hello! > >> This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it >> really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact >> actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple >> misprint. >> >

Re: [PATCH, Atom] Fix performance regression with -mtune=atom

2011-10-14 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it > really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact > actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple > misprint. > > > This patch fixes performance regression with -mtune=atom. Changing > > atom

Re: [PATCH, Atom] Fix performance regression with -mtune=atom

2011-10-14 Thread Vladimir Yakovlev
This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple misprint. Please look. Vladimir 2011/9/30 Vladimir Yakovlev : > This patch fixes performance regression