On 10/09/17 15:02, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/09/17 14:17, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Index: gcc/doc/rtl.texi
>> ===
>> --- gcc/doc/rtl.texi (revision 251752)
>> +++ gcc/doc/rtl.texi (working copy)
>> @@ -2252,6 +2252,13 @@
On 06/09/17 14:17, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 09/06/17 14:51, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for your review!
On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi B
Hi,
ping... for the documentation part.
Thanks,
Bernd.
On 09/06/17 17:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 06/09/17 14:17, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 09/06/17 14:51, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>> On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi
On 06/09/17 14:17, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 09/06/17 14:51, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for your review!
On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edl
On 09/06/17 14:51, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi Kyrill,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wr
On 09/06/17 14:51, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi Kyrill,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wr
On 06/09/17 13:44, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi Kyrill,
>>
>> Thanks for your review!
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Hi Bernd,
>>>
>>> On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 01/
On 09/04/17 21:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
>
> On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi Bernd,
>>
>> On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 01/13/1
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for your review!
On 09/04/17 15:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 18/12/16
Hi Bernd,
On 18/01/17 15:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on
Ping...
On 06/14/17 14:33, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> On 06/01/17 18:00, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ping...
>>
>> On 05/12/17 18:49, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Ping...
>>>
>>> On 04/29/17 19:21, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Ping...
On 04/20/17 20:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping
Ping...
On 06/01/17 18:00, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> On 05/12/17 18:49, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ping...
>>
>> On 04/29/17 19:21, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Ping...
>>>
>>> On 04/20/17 20:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Ping...
for this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
Ping...
On 05/12/17 18:49, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> On 04/29/17 19:21, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ping...
>>
>> On 04/20/17 20:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Ping...
>>>
>>> for this patch:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01351.html
>>>
>>> On 01/18/17 16:36, Bernd Edlin
Ping...
On 04/29/17 19:21, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> On 04/20/17 20:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ping...
>>
>> for this patch:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01351.html
>>
>> On 01/18/17 16:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 0
Ping...
On 04/20/17 20:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> for this patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01351.html
>
> On 01/18/17 16:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 01/13/17 14:50, Ri
Ping...
for this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01351.html
On 01/18/17 16:36, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edl
On 01/13/17 19:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>> On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on this
one.
When tryi
On 01/13/17 17:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on this one.
>>>
>>> When trying the split the *arm_cmpdi_insn and *arm_cmpdi_unsigne
On 01/13/17 14:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on this one.
>>
>> When trying the split the *arm_cmpdi_insn and *arm_cmpdi_unsigned
>> before reload, a mis-compilation in libgcc f
On 18/12/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on this one.
>
> When trying the split the *arm_cmpdi_insn and *arm_cmpdi_unsigned
> before reload, a mis-compilation in libgcc function __gnu_satfractdasq
> was discovered, see [1] for
Hi,
this is related to PR77308, the follow-up patch will depend on this one.
When trying the split the *arm_cmpdi_insn and *arm_cmpdi_unsigned
before reload, a mis-compilation in libgcc function __gnu_satfractdasq
was discovered, see [1] for more details.
The reason seems to be that when the *ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
