Hi,
does this follow-up patch look reasonable?
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg01945.html
Is it OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
On 11/21/16 21:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 18 November 2016 at 16:50, Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>> On 11/18/16 12:58, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> O
On 22/11/16 14:42, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
does this follow-up patch look reasonable?
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg01945.html
Is it OK for trunk?
Ah yes, this one slipped my attention.
This is ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Thanks
Bernd.
On 11/21/16 21:46, Christophe Lyon wr
On 18 November 2016 at 16:50, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 11/18/16 12:58, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 17 November 2016 at 10:23, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/11/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi!
This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionally.
On 11/21/16 18:50, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
> Any update on the other patch you mentioned? This one breaks
> bootstrap of arm-linux-gnueabihf with certain options like
> "--with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=neon --with-float=hard".
> I created PR78453 for tracking.
>
> Thanks,
> bin
Oh, sorry.
Th
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On 11/18/16 12:58, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 17 November 2016 at 10:23, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/11/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi!
This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionall
On 11/18/16 12:58, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 17 November 2016 at 10:23, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/11/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionally.
>>>
>>> It is meant to fix cases, where the patch to reduce the
On 17 November 2016 at 10:23, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> On 09/11/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionally.
>>
>> It is meant to fix cases, where the patch to reduce the sha512
>> stack usage splits ldrd/strd instructions int
On 09/11/16 12:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi!
This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionally.
It is meant to fix cases, where the patch to reduce the sha512
stack usage splits ldrd/strd instructions into separate ldr/str insns,
but is technically independent from the other pat
Hi!
This patch enables the ldrd/strd peephole rules unconditionally.
It is meant to fix cases, where the patch to reduce the sha512
stack usage splits ldrd/strd instructions into separate ldr/str insns,
but is technically independent from the other patch:
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
