On 11/06/14 10:30, Charles Baylis wrote:
> ping?
>
Sorry, can you resend this as a series of mails, with one patch per mail.
R.
> On 22 May 2014 11:08, Charles Baylis wrote:
>> On 1 May 2014 16:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> I think really, you've got three independent changes here:
>>
>> Ve
ping?
On 22 May 2014 11:08, Charles Baylis wrote:
> On 1 May 2014 16:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> I think really, you've got three independent changes here:
>
> Version 2 of this patch series is now a 9 patch series which addresses
> most of the following. Exceptions discussed below.
>
>> 1) O
On 1 May 2014 16:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I think really, you've got three independent changes here:
Version 2 of this patch series is now a 9 patch series which addresses
most of the following. Exceptions discussed below.
> 1) Optimize the prologue/epilogue sequences when ldrd is available