> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Earnshaw
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:01 AM
> To: Zhenqiang Chen
> Cc: 'Jeff Law'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH, ARM, testcase] Skip target arm-neon for
> lp1
w
>> Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH, ARM, testcase] Skip target arm-neon for
>> lp1243022.c
>>
>> On 11/27/13 02:05, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>>> Ping?
>> Thanks for including the actual patch you're pinging, it helps :-)
>>
>>>>> Hi,
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:43 AM
> To: Zhenqiang Chen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
> Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH, ARM, testcase] Skip target arm-neon
On 11/27/13 02:05, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Ping?
Thanks for including the actual patch you're pinging, it helps :-)
Hi,
lp1243022.c will fail with options: -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard.
Logs show it does not generate auto-incremental instruction in pass
auto_inc_dec. In this case, the check of
[PATCH, ARM, testcase] Skip target arm-neon for lp1243022.c
>
> Hi,
>
> lp1243022.c will fail with options: -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard.
>
> Logs show it does not generate auto-incremental instruction in pass
> auto_inc_dec. In this case, the check of REG_INC note at subreg
Hi,
lp1243022.c will fail with options: -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard.
Logs show it does not generate auto-incremental instruction in pass
auto_inc_dec. In this case, the check of REG_INC note at subreg2 will
be invalid. So skip the check for target arm-neon.
All PASS with the following options:
