On 27/11/13 18:27, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>> How can that be correct?
>>>
>>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>>> completely eliminates the need for secon
On 27 November 2013 19:27, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> How can that be correct?
>>>
>>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>>> completely eliminates the n
On 11/27/2013, 1:20 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 10:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional
registers are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use
of LRA completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
When I design
On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
How can that be correct?
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
Vladimir explained me that in that cas
On 11/27/13 10:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional
registers are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use
of LRA completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
When I designed LRA I wanted to remove as many hooks a
On 27 November 2013 18:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 11/27/2013, 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On 11/27/2013, 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
Notice that this patch is a prerequisite
On 27/11/13 17:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> How can that be correct?
>>
>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>> completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
>
> Vladimir explained me t
> How can that be correct?
>
> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
> completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
Vladimir explained me that in that case on arm, secondary reload hoo
On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
ARM. Bootst
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
>> Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
>> ARM. Bootstrapped on a9 and a15
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
> Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
> ARM. Bootstrapped on a9 and a15 without any regression in the
> testsuite as LRA is off by de
Hi,
this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
ARM. Bootstrapped on a9 and a15 without any regression in the
testsuite as LRA is off by default and with the regression reported in
the thread bellow wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
