On 31/01/14 12:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
ping, adding build maintainers
I was hoping one of the configury maintainers would comment on this. No
such luck.
Based on the following in the manual:
"@code{MULTIARCH_DIRNAME} is not used for configurations that support
both multilib and multiarc
ping, adding build maintainers
Am 10.01.2014 12:06, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Am 10.01.2014 10:49, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
>> On 10 January 2014 17:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 10.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
Hi,
MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was removed @r196649 since the dir in
Am 10.01.2014 10:49, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
> On 10 January 2014 17:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 10.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was removed @r196649 since the dir info had been
>>> combined in MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES.
>>>
>>> But MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was r
On 10 January 2014 17:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 10.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
>> Hi,
>>
>> MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was removed @r196649 since the dir info had been
>> combined in MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES.
>>
>> But MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was re-added @r201164. With this change, the
>> final multi
Am 10.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Zhenqiang Chen:
> Hi,
>
> MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was removed @r196649 since the dir info had been
> combined in MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES.
>
> But MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was re-added @r201164. With this change, the
> final multiarch_dir is combined as
> "aarch64-linux-gnu:aarch64-lin
Hi,
MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was removed @r196649 since the dir info had been
combined in MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES.
But MULTIARCH_DIRNAME was re-added @r201164. With this change, the
final multiarch_dir is combined as
"aarch64-linux-gnu:aarch64-linux-gnu", which is incorrect and leads to
multiarch build fail
