On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:11:50PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Except the patch includes a change to pattern vsx_xxpermdi_ that
> is not explained nor mentioned in the ChangeLog.
Yes, that vsx_xxpermdi_ patch was wrong. I believe that snuck in because
I had done the work on an older tree befor
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> Pat Haugen noticed we were doing stores in benchmarks where we were doing
> vector reductions to extract the final float element. So I decided to take a
> look. This code implements the vector reductions without doing stores for
> float
I'm wondering whether the following patch to add V4SF and V2DF reductions fell
through the cracks?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01525.html
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
5 Technology Place Drive, M/S 2757, Westford, MA 01886-3141, USA
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com fax +1 (978) 399-689
Pat Haugen noticed we were doing stores in benchmarks where we were doing
vector reductions to extract the final float element. So I decided to take a
look. This code implements the vector reductions without doing stores for
float vectors, and eliminates a vector shift for double vectors.
I susp