Re: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 4/5] or1k: Initial support for FPU

2019-07-03 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 07:19:56AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:51PM +0200, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 7/3/19 5:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > >> @@ -212,6 +214,7 @@ enum reg_class > > >> #define REG_CLASS_CONTENTS \ > > >> { { 0x, 0x000

Re: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 4/5] or1k: Initial support for FPU

2019-07-03 Thread Stafford Horne
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:51PM +0200, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 7/3/19 5:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> @@ -212,6 +214,7 @@ enum reg_class > >> #define REG_CLASS_CONTENTS \ > >> { { 0x, 0x }, \ > >>{ SIBCALL_REGS_MASK, 0 }, \ > >> + { 0x7efe,

Re: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 4/5] or1k: Initial support for FPU

2019-07-03 Thread Richard Henderson
On 7/3/19 5:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> @@ -212,6 +214,7 @@ enum reg_class >> #define REG_CLASS_CONTENTS \ >> { { 0x, 0x }, \ >>{ SIBCALL_REGS_MASK, 0 }, \ >> + { 0x7efe, 0x }, \ > > Above you said r0, r30, r31 are excluded, but t