On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:10:29 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Thanks. I've applied this patch to trunk.
>
> > gcc/cp/
> > * (cp_parser_oacc_single_int_clause): New function.
> > (cp_parse
Hi!
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:10:29 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Thanks. I've applied this patch to trunk.
> gcc/cp/
> * (cp_parser_oacc_single_int_clause): New function.
> (cp_parser_oacc_clause_vector_length): Delete.
> (cp_parser_omp_clause_num_gangs): D
On 11/04/2015 10:09 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> A single function is better, to avoid unnecessary code duplication.
Thanks. I've applied this patch to trunk.
Cesar
2015-11-04 Cesar Philippidis
gcc/cp/
* (cp_parser_oacc_single_int_clause): New function.
(cp_parser_oacc_clause_vector_length
On 10/30/2015 05:21 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 10/30/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Another thing is what Jason as C++ maintainer wants, it is nice to get rid
of some code redundancies, on the other side the fact tha
On 10/30/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> Another thing is what Jason as C++ maintainer wants, it is nice to get rid
>>> of some code redundancies, on the other side the fact that there is one
>>> function per non-terminal
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> The openacc spec doesn't actually define int-expr, but we take to me
> mean a single integral value. In general, the openacc spec uses the term
> list to describe comma separated expressions. So we've been assuming
So does OpenMP
On 10/30/2015 06:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:02:11PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> I noticed that num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length are parsed in
>> somewhat insistent ways in the c++ FE. Both vector_length and num_gangs
>> bail out whenever as soon as they
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:02:11PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> I noticed that num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length are parsed in
> somewhat insistent ways in the c++ FE. Both vector_length and num_gangs
> bail out whenever as soon as they detect errors, whereas num_workers
> does not. Bes
I noticed that num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length are parsed in
somewhat insistent ways in the c++ FE. Both vector_length and num_gangs
bail out whenever as soon as they detect errors, whereas num_workers
does not. Besides for that, they are also checking for integral
expressions as the argum
