2016-09-05 12:56 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
> Ok, thanks. The full updated patch is below. I also removed the
> '--whole-archive' thing from -static-libmpxwrappers case.
This version is OK for trunk with proper ChangeLog and after proper testing.
> Would that be possible to backport that patc
Ok, thanks. The full updated patch is below. I also removed the
'--whole-archive' thing from -static-libmpxwrappers case.
Would that be possible to backport that patch to 6 branch as well?
And could you please also address Sergey's comment on adding weak
symbol that he's made in the bugzilla?
dif
2016-08-31 16:37 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
> 2016-08-31 12:18 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
>> 2016-08-30 21:53 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
>>> Would something like that count?
>>>
>>> I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
>>> you provide the -Wl,-as-needed option
2016-08-31 12:18 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> 2016-08-30 21:53 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
>> Would something like that count?
>>
>> I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
>> you provide the -Wl,-as-needed option to the linker.
>> (In all other cases warning would be
2016-08-30 21:53 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
> Would something like that count?
>
> I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
> you provide the -Wl,-as-needed option to the linker.
> (In all other cases warning would be redundant). Are we able to check
> that on runtime
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Would something like that count?
>
> I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
> you provide the -Wl,-as-needed option to the linker.
> (In all other cases warning would be redundant). Are we able to check
> th
Would something like that count?
I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
you provide the -Wl,-as-needed option to the linker.
(In all other cases warning would be redundant). Are we able to check
that on runtime?
diff --git a/gcc/config.in b/gcc/config.in
index fc3321
2016-08-25 12:27 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko :
> The attached patched fixes the usage of MPX in presence of
> "-Wl,-as-needed" option. 'make checked' on MPX-enabled machine.
>
> "--push-state" and "--pop-state" are not supported by gold at the
> moment. But that's OK because using MPX with gold on
The attached patched fixes the usage of MPX in presence of
"-Wl,-as-needed" option. 'make checked' on MPX-enabled machine.
"--push-state" and "--pop-state" are not supported by gold at the
moment. But that's OK because using MPX with gold only recommended in
static build.
Would that be OK for tru
