On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:26:47AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > I think it makes sense to disable them by default if gas doesn't support
> > them with that ability to override the auto detection by a configure
> > switch (get the GCC generated ones). The patch looks too heavy for this
> > stage and
On 02/10/2018 06:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 10, 2018 1:53:41 PM GMT+01:00, Alexandre Oliva
> wrote:
>> I was shocked when you, richi, reported huge debug info growth after
>> the
>> LVU and IEPM patches went in. At first, I suspected IEPM, due to
>> possibly keeping more lexical
On February 10, 2018 1:53:41 PM GMT+01:00, Alexandre Oliva
wrote:
>I was shocked when you, richi, reported huge debug info growth after
>the
>LVU and IEPM patches went in. At first, I suspected IEPM, due to
>possibly keeping more lexical blocks around, but my investigation
>showed
>a lot of the
I was shocked when you, richi, reported huge debug info growth after the
LVU and IEPM patches went in. At first, I suspected IEPM, due to
possibly keeping more lexical blocks around, but my investigation showed
a lot of the growth was actually due to switching from asm-generated
line number sectio
