On August 12, 2014 8:15:34 AM CEST, Roman Gareev wrote:
>> Checking for this specific AST may cause failures with future
>versions of
>> isl that choose a different schedule. Could you write a regular
>expression
>> that checks that there is no if-condition contained in a for loop? I
>think
>> thi
> Checking for this specific AST may cause failures with future versions of
> isl that choose a different schedule. Could you write a regular expression
> that checks that there is no if-condition contained in a for loop? I think
> this best models the issue that was addressed in the original bug r
On 06/08/2014 17:21, Roman Gareev wrote:
I've tested the modified version of Graphite using the gcc test suite
and haven't found out new failed tests.
However, pr35356-2.c is still not suitable for testing. The ISL AST
generated from its source code doesn't contain MIN or MAX.
if (k <= -1)
I've tested the modified version of Graphite using the gcc test suite
and haven't found out new failed tests.
However, pr35356-2.c is still not suitable for testing. The ISL AST
generated from its source code doesn't contain MIN or MAX.
if (k <= -1) {
for (int c1 = 0; c1 < n; c1 += 1)
On 05/08/2014 06:02, Roman Gareev wrote:
I've attached the patch, which sets the separate option for all
dimensions. Is it fine for trunk?
LGTM.
Tobias
I've attached the patch, which sets the separate option for all
dimensions. Is it fine for trunk?
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev.
2014-08-05 Roman Gareev
[gcc/]
* graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:
(set_options): New function.
(scop_to_isl_ast
