ok.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> is cgraph_init_gid_map called after linking?
>
> Oh, forgot that part. It's interesting that the test can pass without
> another cgraph_init_gid_map call.
>
> Patch updated. Rete
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> is cgraph_init_gid_map called after linking?
Oh, forgot that part. It's interesting that the test can pass without
another cgraph_init_gid_map call.
Patch updated. Retested and the performance is OK.
Dehao
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Mar 26
is cgraph_init_gid_map called after linking?
David
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Patch updated, passed performance tests.
>
> Dehao
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Add comment to the new function. init_node_map is better invoked after
>> t
Patch updated, passed performance tests.
Dehao
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Add comment to the new function. init_node_map is better invoked after
> the link step to avoid creating entries with for dead nodes.
>
> Ok if large perf testing is fine.
>
> David
>
> On
Add comment to the new function. init_node_map is better invoked after
the link step to avoid creating entries with for dead nodes.
Ok if large perf testing is fine.
David
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> This patch refactors LIPO fixup related code to move it into a
> stand
This patch refactors LIPO fixup related code to move it into a
standalone function. This makes sure that
symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes is called right after the fixup so
that there is not dangling cgraph nodes any time.
Bootstrapped and regression test on-going.
OK for google-4_8?
Thanks,
Deha
