Thank you. I fixed the typo and committed.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Yi Yang wrote:
>> Patch v2.
>>
>> Trunk no longer set SECTION_NAME for implicit section names, so this
>> probably does not apply to trunk. It's probably not neces
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Yi Yang wrote:
> Patch v2.
>
> Trunk no longer set SECTION_NAME for implicit section names, so this
> probably does not apply to trunk. It's probably not necessary for
> trunk either.
>
> Tested for Google 4.8(albeit unnecessary) and 4.9 branch.
>
> diff --git gcc/
Patch v2.
Trunk no longer set SECTION_NAME for implicit section names, so this
probably does not apply to trunk. It's probably not necessary for
trunk either.
Tested for Google 4.8(albeit unnecessary) and 4.9 branch.
diff --git gcc/bb-reorder.c gcc/bb-reorder.c
index a1b3e65..b9a829e 100644
---
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Yi Yang wrote:
> This bug is caused by my last patch, which did not differentiate
> between explicit section names (via attributes) and implicit section
> names (via -ffunction-section).
>
> This patch fixes that.
>
> --
>
> diff --git gcc/bb-reorder.c gcc/bb-reord
This bug is caused by my last patch, which did not differentiate
between explicit section names (via attributes) and implicit section
names (via -ffunction-section).
This patch fixes that.
--
diff --git gcc/bb-reorder.c gcc/bb-reorder.c
index 8f8c420..2115b01 100644
--- gcc/bb-reorder.c
+++ gcc/
