On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:37:14AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:49 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Carlotti writes:
> > > Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
> > > OK to backport to GCC 13?
> >
> > OK, tha
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:49 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Andrew Carlotti writes:
> > Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
> > OK to backport to GCC 13?
>
> OK, thanks.
In case you want it in 13.2 please push it really soon, we want to do 13.2
Andrew Carlotti writes:
> Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
> OK to backport to GCC 13?
OK, thanks.
Richard
> Many intrinsics currently depend on both an architecture version and a
> feature, despite the corresponding instructions being available within
> GC
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 07:35:26PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:44 PM Andrew Carlotti via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
> > OK to backport to GCC 13?
> >
> >
> > Many intrinsics currently depend
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:44 PM Andrew Carlotti via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
> OK to backport to GCC 13?
>
>
> Many intrinsics currently depend on both an architecture version and a
> feature, despite the corresponding instructio
Updated patch to fix the fp16 intrinsic pragmas, and pushed to master.
OK to backport to GCC 13?
Many intrinsics currently depend on both an architecture version and a
feature, despite the corresponding instructions being available within
GCC at lower architecture versions.
LLVM has already remo