> >> * gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c:
> >> Require arm_arch_v8a_ok and add march option.
> >>
>
> Shouldn't you use
> add_options_for_arm_arch_v8a instead?
Done, committed as r249214.
I don't quite understand the difference, but this test suite does quite
counter intuitive things
On 13 June 2017 at 12:13, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 13/06/17 11:12, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This fixes the failing test gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c by
>> requiring arm_arch_v8a_ok.
>>
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>
> Ok.
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> 2017-06-13 Tam
On 13/06/17 11:12, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
This fixes the failing test gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c by
requiring arm_arch_v8a_ok.
OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill
gcc/testsuite/
2017-06-13 Tamar Christina
* gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c:
Require arm_arch_v8a_o
Hi All,
This fixes the failing test gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c by
requiring arm_arch_v8a_ok.
OK for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/
2017-06-13 Tamar Christina
* gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c:
Require arm_arch_v8a_ok and add march option.
Thanks,
Tamardiff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc