Nope, just do it after testing it and adjust with Christophes follow up
R
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 10:36 Andre Vieira (lists), <
andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
> On 08/03/2019 17:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wr
Ok.
Ramana
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 20:24 Christophe Lyon,
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 12:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
> >
> > No, go ahead (after proper testin
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 12:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
>
> No, go ahead (after proper testing).
>
Hi,
I've noticed that this new test fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabi
--with-m
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
No, go ahead (after proper testing).
Richard.
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
> On 08/03/2019 17:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > vcvtb.f16.f64 and vcvtb.f64.f16 were being mad
Hi,
Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
Cheers,
Andre
On 08/03/2019 17:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi,
vcvtb.f16.f64 and vcvtb.f64.f16 were being made available even for FPUs
that do not support double precision. This patch fixes that.
Regression tested for arm-none-
Hi,
vcvtb.f16.f64 and vcvtb.f64.f16 were being made available even for FPUs
that do not support double precision. This patch fixes that.
Regression tested for arm-none-eabi.
Committed in r269499.
Cheers,
Andre
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-03-08 Andre Vieira
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_FP
