Re: [Fortran, committed] Fix bugs in the dg-* directives in the test suite

2013-06-04 Thread Tobias Burnus
Mike Stump wrote: :-o, The things we never knew. Anyway, use of hacks like this, should result in the hack being documented. At least then we can find them with find-grep in emacs, and know about it. I'm not in favor of using hacks like this, I don't endorse it. If someone wants to approve such

Re: [Fortran, committed] Fix bugs in the dg-* directives in the test suite (was: testsuite oddities)

2013-06-04 Thread Mike Stump
[ sorry for the dup ] On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > I think some of the test cases might to it on purpose: "dg-do run" causes > the test case to run only once while "dg-do run" runs multiple times with > different options. If the testcase is supposed to test the run-time

Re: [Fortran, committed] Fix bugs in the dg-* directives in the test suite (was: testsuite oddities)

2013-06-04 Thread Mike Stump
On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > I think some of the test cases might to it on purpose: "dg-do run" causes > the test case to run only once while "dg-do run" runs multiple times with > different options. If the testcase is supposed to test the run-time library, > calling it

[Fortran, committed] Fix bugs in the dg-* directives in the test suite (was: testsuite oddities)

2013-06-04 Thread Tobias Burnus
Manfred Schwarb wrote: I did some tests for unbalanced curly braces in the gfortran testsuite and got quite some output, see attached patch. additionally, - corrected "dg-do run" issues (double space) I think some of the test cases might to it on purpose: "dg-do run" causes the test case to