Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/3] C++20 constexpr lib part 1/3

2019-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:47 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:30:14PM +, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which > > > means > > > Ed's patch should make a

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/3] C++20 constexpr lib part 1/3

2019-08-06 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:30:14PM +, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which means > > Ed's patch should make almost no difference at all. 99% of the patch > > has no effect unless co

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/3] C++20 constexpr lib part 1/3

2019-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which means > Ed's patch should make almost no difference at all. 99% of the patch > has no effect unless compiling with -std=gnu++2a. > > I don't see any ICE running the libstdc+