On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This patch was committed to trunk (r265940), but HJ's review comments
> were never addressed (and look correct to me):
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3QJw9yc7Scra74WXzR3yBDR6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2Fml%2Fgcc-patches%2F2016-07%2Fmsg00146.html
On 29/01/19 14:12 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch t
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> > Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
> >
> > Marek
>
> H
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
>
> Marek
Hi,
I submitted the original patch because it was not written by me but by Davide,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20/10/18 12:18 +0200, Romain Geissler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
> > patch implementing it was already submitted in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-0
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 04:34:59PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:01:30PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> > I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> > -fuse-ld=lld is supported (c
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:01:30PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> -fuse-ld=lld is supported (considering the linker is now mature enough
> to link large C/C++ application
On 20/10/18 12:18 +0200, Romain Geissler wrote:
Hi,
I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
patch implementing it was already submitted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01722.html by Davide
Italiano. This patch still applies correctly to current tru
>
> Is there any other reason why -fuse-ld=ldd shall not be supported by gcc ?
>
> Cheers,
> Romain
>
> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davide Italiano
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
> Subject: [PA
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
The patch is OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks. Can you please apply it as I don't have any commit rights ?
The patch can be found in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01240.html
Here is a valid gcc/ChangeLog correctly formated where I am ref
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:00 PM Romain Geissler
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> > >
> >
> > LGTM. But I can't approve it.
> >
> > --
>
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> >
>
> LGTM. But I can't approve it.
>
> --
> H.J.
Hi,
Is there any gcc reviewer that could comment whether or not this sm
t; if yes, why ?
>
> Is there any other reason why -fuse-ld=ldd shall not be supported by gcc ?
>
> Cheers,
> Romain
>
> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davide Italiano
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
> Subject:
?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Romain
>>
>> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Davide Italiano
>> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add support for -fuse-ld=lld.
>>
>
oday, and
> if yes, why ?
>
> Is there any other reason why -fuse-ld=ldd shall not be supported by gcc ?
>
> Cheers,
> Romain
>
> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davide Italiano
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
&
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Davide Italiano
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add support for -fuse-ld=lld.
* collect2.c (main): Support -fuse-ld=lld.
* common.opt: Add fuse-ld=lld
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -fuse-ld=lld
* opts.c: Ignore -fuse-ld=lld
---
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> > > wrote:
> > >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option or
On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
>>> wrote:
+ HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>
recipe for target
> 'tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/OutputSections.cpp.o' failed
> gmake[4]: *** [tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/OutputSections.cpp.o]
> Error 1
>
> Can you fix it?
>> --
>> Davide
>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dav
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
>> > wrote:
>> >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>>
On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> > wrote:
> >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
> >> wrote:
>
th
> mentioning.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Davide
>
> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davide Italiano
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add support for -fuse-ld=lld.
>
> * collect2.
mentioning.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>
> Hi, can anybody take a look?
lld isn't compatible with GCC:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28414
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Davide
>
>>> --
>>> Davide
>>>
>>> From 323c2
/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/build.make:302: recipe for target
'tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/OutputSections.cpp.o' failed
gmake[4]: *** [tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/OutputSections.cpp.o] Error 1
Can you fix it?
H.J.
> --
> Davide
>
>>> --
>>>
t; Davide
>>
>> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Davide Italiano
>> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add support for -fuse-ld=lld.
>>
>> * collect2.c (main): Support -fuse-ld=lld.
&
utside of the scope of this patch, but I thought worth
> mentioning.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Davide
>
> From 323c23d79c91d7dcee2f29b9ced8c1c00703d346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davide Italiano
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add
:00 2001
From: Davide Italiano
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:51:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Driver: Add support for -fuse-ld=lld.
* collect2.c (main): Support -fuse-ld=lld.
* common.opt: Add fuse-ld=lld
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -fuse-ld=lld
* opts.c: Ignore -fuse-ld=lld
---
gcc/collect
27 matches
Mail list logo
