This testcase was fixed after r14-2135-gd915762ea9043da85 and
there was no testcase for it before so adding one is a good thing.
Committed as obvious after testing the testcase to make sure it works.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/110444
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr1
I've committed another testcase from a bugzilla issue that now appears
to be fixed.
-Sandra
commit 9a0e34eb45e36d4f90cedb61191fd31da0bab256
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date: Fri Oct 22 17:22:00 2021 -0700
Add testcase for PR fortran/95196
2021-10-22 José Rui Faustino de Sousa
I've committed this slightly cleaned-up version of the testcase
originally submitted with the now-fixed issue PR 94289.
-Sandra
commit c31d2d14f798dc7ca9cc078200d37113749ec3bd
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date: Fri Oct 22 11:08:19 2021 -0700
Add testcase for PR fortran/94289
2021-10
Hi,
I have committed the patch below to add the testcase for the already
fixed PR ipa/92528 to the testsuite.
Thanks,
Martin
2019-11-18 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/92528
* g++.dg/ipa/pr92528.C: New test.
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr92528.C
=
Hi!
While in C a constant expression can't start with
score(constant-integral-expression),
in C++11 it can and so we need to do tentative parsing or skipping to the
closing ) to check if there is : to find out if it is trait-score or just
part of a constant expression.
The following patch adds a
Hi!
This has been fixed already with r273096, but it is useful to have also a
Fortran testcase. Committed to trunk as obvious.
2019-10-17 Jakub Jelinek
PR fortran/87752
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr87752.f90: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/pr87752.f90.jj 2019-10-
Hi!
I've noticed we don't have any testcases covering manifestly constant
evaluation inside of explicit bool, tested thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on
x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2019-05-23 Jakub Jelinek
* g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated8.C: New test
Hi!
The following PR has been fixed by the changes to evaluate constexpr
functions on pre-folding/genericization trees.
I've tested the following testcase on x86_64-linux and committed to trunk as
obvious, so that we don't regress it.
2019-04-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/86953
* g
Hi!
The following testcase reduced from webkitgtk started to be rejected with
r268850
and is accepted again since r269265. The testcase isn't very similar to the
committed one, so I've tested following on x86_64-linux both with trunk and
with r269264 and committed to trunk as obvious.
2019-03-1
Hi!
This got fixed with r257057 aka PR84031 fix, but the committed testcase
doesn't resemble anything close to this one.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2019-03-08 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/82075
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp49.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, this is a LRA hang introduced with the
r266422 IRA costs change and which went away with r266862 IRA costs change.
Tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux plus tested with older cc1 from end of
November where it timeouts, committed to trunk as obvious.
2019-01-11 Jakub
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:15:54PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2018, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > Regstrapped on x86_64- and i686-linux-gnu, mistakenly along with a patch
> > with a known regression, and got only that known regression. Retesting
> > without it. Ok to install?
>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:34:14AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
>
> PR c++/85569
> * constexpr.c (adjust_temp_type): Test for type equality with
> same_type_p.
> (constexpr_call_hasher::equal): Likewise.
>
> for gcc/testsuite
>
> PR c++/855
Hi!
I've committed the following testcase for already fixed PR, which has been
fixed by the PR87288 fix, after testing on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
2018-12-04 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/87320
* gcc.dg/pr87320.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr87320.c.jj 201
Hi!
This testcase broke on x86_64-linux with -O3 with r227775
and got fixed or went latent with r236372. I've just committed the
testcase to the testsuite as obvious, let's close the PR now.
2018-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/71109
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr71109.c
Hi!
The following testcase has been fixed by Nathan with r266158
aka PR debug/88006 and PR debug/87462. In order to close the PR, I've
tested following testcase on x86_64-linux and i686-linux and committed to
trunk.
2018-11-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR debug/85550
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf
Hi!
This testcase has been fixed by the PR85793 fix r260317.
I've committed following test as obvious so that we can close the PR.
2018-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/85794
* gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr85794.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr85794.c.jj 2018-11
Hi!
This got fixed with r253266, but I don't see it covered with a testcase.
Tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2018-03-29 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/85108
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-31.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-31.C.jj
Hi!
This PR got fixed in r251433 which I'm afraid is not backportable,
we were trying to register local specialization during dwarf2out_type_decl.
I've committed the testcase as obvious to trunk, so that we don't regress
on it again:
2018-03-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/84813
* g+
Hi!
This ICE got fixed already in r257820, but more testsuite coverage doesn't
hurt.
2018-02-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/84556
* g++.dg/gomp/pr84556.C: New test.
* g++.dg/vect/pr84556.cc: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr84556.C.jj 2018-02-26 11:13:36.848451
Hi!
ICE on this testcase has been introduced in r236615 and got fixed on the trunk
with r253600. I've committed the testcase to trunk, so that we don't
regress in it as obvious.
2018-02-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/84496
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr84496.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.d
Hi!
This testcase got fixed in r257155 aka PR83942, but unlike
the PR83942 testcase which regressed during 8.x stage1 this one used
to fail before too, so I think it is worth adding another testcase for it.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2018-02-20 Jakub Jelinek
Hi!
This testcase got fixed with Honza's PR middle-end/83575 fix
r256479, so I've just added a testcase after testing it on x86_64/i686-linux
and committed as obvious, so we can close the PR.
2018-01-17 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/83771
* gcc.dg/pr83771.c: New test.
---
Hi!
This bug has been already fixed by Eric in r254188.
Regtested on x86_64-linux -m64/-m32, verified it FAILs with the patch reverted
on both, committed to trunk as obvious.
2017-12-08 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/81595
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr81595.c: New test.
--- g
Hi!
This testcase has been fixed by r253146 but that testcase is quite different
from this one, so I've committed this to trunk as obvious.
2017-12-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/83283
* g++.dg/torture/pr83283.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr83283.C.jj
Hi,
On 28 November 2017 at 11:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This testcase was fixed by Segher's r254875:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00340.html
> on the trunk, so I've committed it to trunk as obvious.
> On release branches it still needs fixing.
>
> 2017-11-28 Jakub Jel
Hi!
This testcase was fixed by Segher's r254875:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00340.html
on the trunk, so I've committed it to trunk as obvious.
On release branches it still needs fixing.
2017-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/81020
* gcc.dg/pr81020.c: N
Hi!
This PR has been fixed in r244218 aka the PR78997 fix.
I've tested the testcase on x86_64-linux with -m32/-m64 (without/with
the PR78997 fix) and committed to trunk as obvious.
2017-01-17 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/71854
* gcc.dg/vect/pr71854.c: New test.
--- gcc/
Hi!
This testcase got accepted in 6.x, started to ICE with r236221,
r236486 stopped ICEing on it and started rejecting it,
r237654 accepts it again. clang++ also accepts it.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk so that the PR can be closed.
2016-11-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/7122
Hi!
This PR has been fixed by r240148. I've checked in the testcase as obvious,
so we can close it.
2016-11-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/72774
* g++.dg/parse/pr72774.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr72774.C.jj 2016-11-11 14:37:39.073659504
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuit
Hi!
This got also fixed by PR69281 fix I've just committed, I've added the
testcase too.
2016-08-19 Jakub Jelinek
PR fortran/72744
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr72744.f90: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/pr72744.f90.jj 2016-08-19
14:49:18.590105777 +0200
+++ gcc/te
Hi,
I committed a testcase that ICEs after applying "Gimple loop
splitting v2" patch to a GCC 6. The IV and the bounds were two
different types which was causing the ICE to happen.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
ChangeLog:
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20160802-1.c: New testcase.
Index: testsuite/gcc.c-tort
Hi!
Honza has fixed this PR in r232356, I've added the testcase as
obvious, so that we can close the PR.
2016-02-08 Jakub Jelinek
PR ipa/69239
* g++.dg/ipa/pr69239.C: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr69239.C.jj 2016-02-08 18:14:08.807338362
+0100
+++ gcc/testsu
Hi!
This PR has been fixed by the PR68701, I've committed
the testcase as obvious to trunk.
2016-01-29 Jakub Jelinek
PR target/66137
* gcc.target/i386/pr66137.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66137.c.jj 2016-01-29 15:05:19.804958974
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g
Hi!
This PR got fixed some time ago, this patch adds a testcase for it.
2014-12-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/63804
* gcc.dg/pr63804.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63804.c.jj 2014-12-15 17:35:31.978451234 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63804.c 2014-12
Hi!
This PR got fixed by a fix for another PR, but I've committed
the testcase to the testsuite for better coverage.
2014-11-18 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/61042
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr61042.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr61042.c.jj2014-1
This adds a testcase for PR62294 that I just fixed on the 4.9
branch.
Tested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
2014-09-03 Marek Polacek
PR c/62294
* gcc.dg/pr62294.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr62294.h: New file.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62294.c gcc/testsuite/gcc
Hi all,
When I was testing the ccmp set of patches on aarch64, I found a
testcase which would ICE. This patch adds the testcase. I don't know
if this testcase ICEs due to other local set of patches though.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
2014-08-16 Andrew Pinski
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20140816-1.c
Hi!
The bug in this PR has been introduced by my r204516 change and fixed
by r205884 (PR59417) fix.
I've committed the testcase as obvious so that we can close the PR.
2013-12-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/59413
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59413.c: New test.
--- gcc/te
gcc/testsuite:
2013-10-28 Claudiu Zissulescu
Joern Rennecke
* gcc.target/arc/jump-around-jump.c: New test.
gcc:
2013-10-28 Joern Rennecke
* config/arc/arc.c (arc_ccfsm_post_advance):
Add comment about TYPE_RETURN.
tmp
Description: Binary data
Hi!
This PR has been fixed recently by PR56988 fix, but adding the testcase
IMHO doesn't hurt. Committed to trunk/4.8.
2013-05-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/57321
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr57321.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr57321.c.jj201
Hi!
This got fixed by Vlad in PR57097, I've committed the testcase as obvious
(so far to trunk, because the fix hasn't been backported to 4.8 branch yet,
will commit there too afterwards).
2013-05-02 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/57131
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr57131.c: Ne
Hi!
This is a testcase that got fixed already by Andreas'
http://gcc.gnu.org/r197839 resp. r197840 commits, but as it lacked a
testcase, I'm adding one that reproduces it on 4.8 branch on x86_64-linux.
Committed as obvious.
2013-04-18 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/56992
*
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Committed the testcase as obvious after a quick test to make sure it
> works. Note someone might need to mark the testcase as only
> executable on targets which have 32bit ints.
Someone like you? There are plenty of greppable
effective-target attributes
Hi,
While I was working on using zero_extract more on the left hand side
in combine, I found a bug in my code but there was no testcase in the
testsuite that tested it. The code originally comes from uboot which
was failing when doing a ping or tftp.
Committed the testcase as obvious after a qu
Hi!
As we have no short testcase for PR53438, I've committed
the following testcase as obvious to trunk and 4.7.
2012-05-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/53505
* c-c++-common/torture/pr53505.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/pr53505.c.jj 2012-05-28
Hi!
This PR got also fixed by my PR51576 patch, as that one was a bootstrap
issue with non-default language, this one adds a testcase for it into
the testsuite.
Regtested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
2011-12-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/51575
* g++.dg/opt/pr5
Hi!
This PR has been fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180058
This patch just adds the testcase from the PR, so it can be closed.
Tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2011-11-24 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/50290
*
Hi!
This PR got fixed by my recent vectorizable_conversion changes,
in particular the truncation of the vec_oprnds[01] vectors on
multistep type promotion if copies > 1.
Testcase tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, checked in as obvious.
2011-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimizati
Hi!
This PR has been fixed without testcase being added,
fixed thusly, regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
committed to trunk.
2011-05-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimization/48381
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr48381.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr48381
50 matches
Mail list logo
