I've backported this to GCC8 too since it had the same failures:
The testcase for PR62178 has been failing for a while due to the pass
conditions being too tight, resulting in failures with -mcmodel=tiny:
ldr q2, [x0], 124
ld1r{v1.4s}, [x1], 4
cmp x0, x2
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:44:36PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:37:05PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> >> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { dup } } } */
> >> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { fmov } } } */
> >
> > { dup } is the same as " dup " , tha
Hi Segher,
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:37:05PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { dup } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { fmov } } } */
>
> { dup } is the same as " dup " , that is, with spaces and all.
> I don't think you want that (there usu
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:37:05PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { dup } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not { fmov } } } */
{ dup } is the same as " dup " , that is, with spaces and all.
I don't think you want that (there usually is a tab charact
The testcase for PR62178 has been failing for a while due to the pass
conditions being too tight, resulting in failures with -mcmodel=tiny:
ldr q2, [x0], 124
ld1r{v1.4s}, [x1], 4
cmp x0, x2
mla v0.4s, v2.4s, v1.4s
bne .L7
-mcmodel=small