On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> The problem here is the code reads:
> /* Check for more than one successor. */
> if (! EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) > 1)
> But that expression is always false as ! has a higher precedence than
>> does. So the obvious thing is to
Hi,
The problem here is the code reads:
/* Check for more than one successor. */
if (! EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) > 1)
But that expression is always false as ! has a higher precedence than
> does. So the obvious thing is to rewrite this statement as:
if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) <= 1)
A
