Re: [COMMITTED] path oracle: Do not look at root oracle for killed defs.

2021-11-08 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 11/6/21 11:35 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: [This is more Andrew's domain, but this is a P1 PR and I'd like to unbreak the SPEC run, since this is a straigthforward fix. When he returns he can double check my work and give additional suggestions.] The problem here is that we are incorrectly thre

Re: [COMMITTED] path oracle: Do not look at root oracle for killed defs.

2021-11-08 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 11/8/21 3:44 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 4:38 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote: [This is more Andrew's domain, but this is a P1 PR and I'd like to unbreak the SPEC run, since this is a straigthforward fix. When he returns he can double check my wo

Re: [COMMITTED] path oracle: Do not look at root oracle for killed defs.

2021-11-08 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 4:38 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote: > > [This is more Andrew's domain, but this is a P1 PR and I'd like to > unbreak the SPEC run, since this is a straigthforward fix. When he > returns he can double check my work and give additional suggestions.] > > The problem

[COMMITTED] path oracle: Do not look at root oracle for killed defs.

2021-11-06 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
[This is more Andrew's domain, but this is a P1 PR and I'd like to unbreak the SPEC run, since this is a straigthforward fix. When he returns he can double check my work and give additional suggestions.] The problem here is that we are incorrectly threading 41->20->21 here: [local count: 5606