On 07/08/17 15:42, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>> Except that I think this would be better done as an 'effective target'
>> test; something like
>>
>> dg-require-effective-target autoincdec
>>
>> that way new ports will be more likely to pick up relevant tests like this.
>
>
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> Except that I think this would be better done as an 'effective target'
> test; something like
>
> dg-require-effective-target autoincdec
>
> that way new ports will be more likely to pick up relevant tests like this.
Sure but what would be a correct implementation of
On 07/08/17 14:59, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Build only if pre-increment is supported. Given there is no config test,
> add a list of targets which have HAVE_PRE_INCREMENT set.
>
> Committed as obvious.
>
Except that I think this would be better done as an 'effective target'
test; something like
Build only if pre-increment is supported. Given there is no config test,
add a list of targets which have HAVE_PRE_INCREMENT set.
Committed as obvious.
2017-08-07 Wilco Dijkstra
PR middle-end/46932
* gcc.dg/pr46932.c: Compile on targets with pre-increment.
--
diff --git a/gc
