Re: [COMMITTED][PATCH][ARM]Add ACLE 2.0 predefined marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV

2014-11-04 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Renlin Li wrote: >> Are you sure that the ACLE documents this with trailing underscores ? >> The copy that I have doesn't. > > > You are right, it's my incaution. I have double checked, the macro should be > __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV. > > Could you please do a obvious fi

Re: [COMMITTED][PATCH][ARM]Add ACLE 2.0 predefined marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV

2014-10-23 Thread Renlin Li
Are you sure that the ACLE documents this with trailing underscores ? The copy that I have doesn't. You are right, it's my incaution. I have double checked, the macro should be __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV. Could you please do a obvious fix? Thank you so much! Kind regards, Renlin

Re: [COMMITTED][PATCH][ARM]Add ACLE 2.0 predefined marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV

2014-10-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jiong Wang wrote: > > On 21/10/14 15:30, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Renlin Li wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is a simple patch to add missing __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__ predefined >>> marco(ACLE 2.0) into TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUIL

[COMMITTED][PATCH][ARM]Add ACLE 2.0 predefined marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV

2014-10-22 Thread Jiong Wang
On 21/10/14 15:30, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Renlin Li wrote: Hi all, This is a simple patch to add missing __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__ predefined marco(ACLE 2.0) into TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS. Is it Okay to commit? gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-10-13 Renlin Li *