On 07/06/2011 04:15 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Ok for the bits that aren't from me anyway, once you're satisfied it's
> sufficiently tested.
I committed this series.
I tested x86_64, ia64, and ppc64-linux; Iain tested i686-darwin9;
and you tested arm-linux. Excluding vax, that covered all the
ta
On 07/03/11 22:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
> So far I've tested this only on x86_64-linux. It needs a bit more
> testing across other targets before going in. Any help that can
> be given there would be welcome.
>
No problems on qemu arm-linux, "{arch=armv7-a,armv7-a/thumb,thumb,}".
Bernd
On 7 Jul 2011, at 00:15, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 07/03/11 22:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
Bernd's original patch to optimize dwarf2 cfi for shrink-wrapping
is difficult to analyze because that optimization was done via a
random debugging hook during final, and the cfi notes are deleted
at the
On 07/03/11 22:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Bernd's original patch to optimize dwarf2 cfi for shrink-wrapping
> is difficult to analyze because that optimization was done via a
> random debugging hook during final, and the cfi notes are deleted
> at the end of final so that we don't get debug com
Bernd's original patch to optimize dwarf2 cfi for shrink-wrapping
is difficult to analyze because that optimization was done via a
random debugging hook during final, and the cfi notes are deleted
at the end of final so that we don't get debug comparison failures.
By pulling the note creation out
