On 10/18/2013 04:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I had thought about making the type and value of atomic_flag hooks , but never
got to it. There is currently one for the TRUE value which is exposed to the
C++ templates as" __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUE
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I had thought about making the type and value of atomic_flag hooks , but never
> got to it. There is currently one for the TRUE value which is exposed to the
> C++ templates as" __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL"
I'm tending to think of this, and alig
On 10/18/2013 01:27 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
right. We may re-visit it when we finalize the ABI changes for c++... Use of
the attribute in c++ will ensure that C and C++ both treat an atomic object
the same... My original discussions with lawrence
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> right. We may re-visit it when we finalize the ABI changes for c++... Use of
> the attribute in c++ will ensure that C and C++ both treat an atomic object
> the same... My original discussions with lawrence and jeffrey over atomics
> concerned the de
On 10/17/2013 05:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I've applied this patch to the C11-atomic branch to fix various
miscellaneous issues.
excellent!
I put a hack in the C++ front end to disable checks on atomic
qualifiers so that libstdc++ builds - I think that if you want other
people to help on
