On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:52:41PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 08:45 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In this PR, Richi pointed out that we don't warn for the case when a
> > declaration with attribute optimize follows the definition which is lacking
> > that attribute. This patch adds
On 05/09/2016 08:45 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR, Richi pointed out that we don't warn for the case when a
declaration with attribute optimize follows the definition which is lacking
that attribute. This patch adds such a warning. Though the question is
whether this shouldn't apply to mo
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In this PR, Richi pointed out that we don't warn for the case when a
> declaration with attribute optimize follows the definition which is lacking
> that attribute. This patch adds such a warning. Though the question is
> whether this shouldn't apply to
In this PR, Richi pointed out that we don't warn for the case when a
declaration with attribute optimize follows the definition which is lacking
that attribute. This patch adds such a warning. Though the question is
whether this shouldn't apply to more attributes than just "optimize". And,
as ca
