On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:53:38PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > Since we had no testing for such cases whatsoever, I took existing flexible
> > array member tests and duplicated them, only adjusted them to use a typedef
> > name, so that we test as m
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Since we had no testing for such cases whatsoever, I took existing flexible
> array member tests and duplicated them, only adjusted them to use a typedef
> name, so that we test as many scenarios as possible - I think this ought to
> give us a reasonable
As discussed in the PR, the problem with this test case:
typedef int A[];
struct S { int i; A a; };
is twofold. Firstly, we ICE with checking on, and secondly, we reject the
testcase. But there's nothing wrong with using typedef name as a flexible
array member.
Turned out the problem was that
