On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
> ok for trunk? The 20030305-1.c testcase is now rejected with hard
> errors instead of resulting just in warnings and ignored initializers,
> but I believe the error is right, initial
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, while most of c-typeck.c handles
constructor_max_index == NULL the same as when
tree_int_cst_lt (constructor_max_index, some_index)
returns false, i.e. some_index is within bounds, there is one spot
that handles this incorrectly and one which doesn't consider NULL
const
