On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This PR is basically the same as PR54113, except this time it's about
> -Wmissing-declarations and not about -Wmissing-prototypes. The problem
> here is that we were emitting bogus warning for a correct use of an
> inline function. Thus fixed in the sa
This PR is basically the same as PR54113, except this time it's about
-Wmissing-declarations and not about -Wmissing-prototypes. The problem
here is that we were emitting bogus warning for a correct use of an
inline function. Thus fixed in the same way as PR54113, that is, don't
warn for inline f
