On 01/29/2016 01:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:35:07AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I can try to stick there an assert whether for FUNCTION_DECL
(DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0) == DECL_EXTERNAL (decl).
Tried that, but cancelled that quickly, I see lots of cases where
DECL_IN
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:35:07AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I can try to stick there an assert whether for FUNCTION_DECL
> (DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0) == DECL_EXTERNAL (decl).
Tried that, but cancelled that quickly, I see lots of cases where
DECL_INITIAL is non-NULL, but DECL_EXTERNAL is set,
On 01/29/2016 11:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:51:34PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 01/28/2016 03:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
+ && DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0
+ && DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
+ && !TREE
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:51:34PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 01/28/2016 03:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >+if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
> >+&& DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0
> >+&& DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> >+&& !TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
> >+&& !DECL_ARTIFICIAL
On 01/28/2016 03:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
+ && DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0
+ && DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
+ && !TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
+ && !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl)
+ && !TREE_NO_WARNING (decl))
Do we need to
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:28:58PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >2016-01-25 Jakub Jelinek
> >
> > PR debug/66869
> > * c-decl.c (c_write_global_declarations_1): Warn with
> > warn_unused_function if static prototype without definition
> >
On 01/27/2016 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:17:18AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
No, simply warn and set TREE_NO_WARNING so cgraph doesn't warn again.
This seems to work too, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-01-25 Jaku
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:17:18AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> No, simply warn and set TREE_NO_WARNING so cgraph doesn't warn again.
This seems to work too, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-01-25 Jakub Jelinek
PR debug/66869
* c
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > --- gcc/c/c-decl.c.jj 2016-01-21 00:41:47.0 +0100
>> > +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c 2016-01-25 16:36:31.973504082 +0100
>> > @@ -10741,11 +10741,19 @@ c_write_global_de
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- gcc/c/c-decl.c.jj 2016-01-21 00:41:47.0 +0100
> > +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c 2016-01-25 16:36:31.973504082 +0100
> > @@ -10741,11 +10741,19 @@ c_write_global_declarations_1 (tree glob
> >if (TREE_CODE (decl) == F
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The early-debug changes moved warnings about unused functions into cgraph.
> The problem is that if we have just unused declarations, they aren't
> sometimes even registered with cgraph and therefore we no longer warn.
>
> Here is an
Hi!
The early-debug changes moved warnings about unused functions into cgraph.
The problem is that if we have just unused declarations, they aren't
sometimes even registered with cgraph and therefore we no longer warn.
Here is an attempt to register those with cgraph anyway to get the warning,
fo
12 matches
Mail list logo