On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Joseph noticed that we were wrongly accepting multiple attributes without
> commas. Thus fixed by breaking out of the loop when parsing the attributes --
> if we don't see a comma after an attribute, then the next tokens must be ));
> if
> not, then th
Joseph noticed that we were wrongly accepting multiple attributes without
commas. Thus fixed by breaking out of the loop when parsing the attributes --
if we don't see a comma after an attribute, then the next tokens must be )); if
not, then the attribute is invalid. I've also added a few more co
