On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:11:02AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > What is worth mentioning is that the "(near initialization for X)"
> > message seems next to useless to me now with caret diagnostics (?).
>
> The caret diagnostics point to the init
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> What is worth mentioning is that the "(near initialization for X)"
> message seems next to useless to me now with caret diagnostics (?).
The caret diagnostics point to the initializer. "near initialization"
says (or should say) what field GCC thinks i
On 04/26/14 03:15, Marek Polacek wrote:
Another column info improvements, this time for initializer
warnings. warning_init and add_pending_init had to gain new location
parameter.
What is worth mentioning is that the "(near initialization for X)"
message seems next to useless to me now with car
Another column info improvements, this time for initializer
warnings. warning_init and add_pending_init had to gain new location
parameter.
What is worth mentioning is that the "(near initialization for X)"
message seems next to useless to me now with caret diagnostics (?).
Regtested/bootstrappe
