On 25 April 2012 18:08, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 25 April 2012 16:46, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
>> wrote:
>>> This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
>>>
>>> pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-init
On 25 April 2012 16:46, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>> This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
>>
>> pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
>> .h = {1},
>> ^
>> pr36446.c:13:3: warning:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
>
> pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
> .h = {1},
> ^
> pr36446.c:13:3: warning: (near initialization for ‘m0.h.b’)
> [-Wmissing-f
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote:
> 2012-04-19 Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez
>
> * c-typeck.c (pop_init_level): Improve diagnostics.
> testsuite/
> * gcc.dg/m-un-2.c: Update.
> * gcc.dg/20011021-1.c: Update.
OK. The strange "near initialization" formulation came in with
This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
.h = {1},
^
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: (near initialization for ‘m0.h.b’)
[-Wmissing-field-initializers]
.h = {1},
^
to:
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: miss
