On 2/8/19 1:58 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 7, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ PR c++/86322. */
Wrong PR number.
Thanks
+ if (local_specializations)
+if (tree r = retrieve_local_specialization (t))
+ return r;
Hmm, I would expect this to do the wrong thing for pack
On Feb 7, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> + PR c++/86322. */
> Wrong PR number.
Thanks
>> + if (local_specializations)
>> +if (tree r = retrieve_local_specialization (t))
>> + return r;
> Hmm, I would expect this to do the wrong thing for pack expansion of a
> lambda, giving us
On 2/7/19 2:24 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
From: Alexandre Oliva
A lambda capture variable initialized with a lambda expr taking more
than one parameter got us confused.
The first problem was that the parameter list was cut short during
tsubsting because we tsubsted it with cp_unevaluated_oper
From: Alexandre Oliva
A lambda capture variable initialized with a lambda expr taking more
than one parameter got us confused.
The first problem was that the parameter list was cut short during
tsubsting because we tsubsted it with cp_unevaluated_operand. We
reset it right after, to tsubst th
