Hi,
On 06/24/2015 05:32 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/static_assert-nomsg.C
===
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/static_assert-nomsg.C(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/static_assert-nomsg.C
On 06/17/2015 03:22 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/17/2015 01:53 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I tried the obvious: an error message with %qE and got 'false'.
constexpr values are evaluated early on.
Is there a possibility that late folding could help or is that
completely different?
Late foldi
On 06/17/2015 01:53 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I tried the obvious: an error message with %qE and got 'false'.
constexpr values are evaluated early on.
Is there a possibility that late folding could help or is that
completely different?
Late folding could help, but I think handling it in libc
On 06/17/2015 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/15/2015 07:14 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I wanted to fix it up as per your suggestion. If someone wants it now I
can retest and commit. Otherwise give me a bit more time.
Someone in LWG was asking about it, and I figured it wouldn't hurt to
On 06/15/2015 07:14 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I wanted to fix it up as per your suggestion. If someone wants it now I
can retest and commit. Otherwise give me a bit more time.
Someone in LWG was asking about it, and I figured it wouldn't hurt to
have this version in now. Glad to hear you'
On 06/15/2015 12:05 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/20/2015 11:28 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many
On 05/20/2015 11:28 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
.
I took the path of building an empty strin
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only
with -pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
.
I took the path of building an empty stri
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
> I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
> -pedantic.
> I think many people just write
> static_assert(thing, "");
> .
>
> I took the
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
.
I took the path of building an empty string in the parser in this case.
I wasn't sure if s
11 matches
Mail list logo
