OK (= true).
Jason
On 1 May 2015 at 01:12, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On 04/30/2015 08:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> .. also, your patch doesn't seem to fix the case of -w instead of
That could be fixed as follows:
if (!warn_narrowing || inhibit_warnings)
ok = true;
else
// pedwarn
>> -Wno-narrowin
Hi again,
On 04/30/2015 08:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. also, your patch doesn't seem to fix the case of -w instead of
-Wno-narrowing. I think we want to check the return value of the
pedwarn instead. I'm testing something.
I'm finishing testing the below: with hindsight, checking the return
.. also, your patch doesn't seem to fix the case of -w instead of
-Wno-narrowing. I think we want to check the return value of the pedwarn
instead. I'm testing something.
Paolo.
Hi,
On 04/30/2015 06:36 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes ICE in PR65858.
For the test-case:
int x { 0.5 };
Eventually, we have to add to the testsuite the testcase too (the code
is simpler but equivalent to what we added for 65801, -flto makes all
the difference). A
Hi,
The attached patch fixes ICE in PR65858.
For the test-case:
int x { 0.5 };
int main() { return 0; }
Compiling with: g++ -flto -Wno-narrowing -std=gnu++11
results in following ICE:
lto1: internal compiler error: in get_constructor, at varpool.c:331
0xd22f73 varpool_node::get_constructor()
../.
