Re: [C++ Path/RFC] PR 60265

2014-06-11 Thread Jason Merrill
On 06/11/2014 12:49 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: .. Core/1742 seems relevant to the difference scoped/unscoped. It's still open, though. And priority 2, so unlikely to be resolved any time soon. The patch is OK. Jason

Re: [C++ Path/RFC] PR 60265

2014-06-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
.. Core/1742 seems relevant to the difference scoped/unscoped. It's still open, though. Thanks, Paolo.

[C++ Path/RFC] PR 60265

2014-06-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, this issue is probably easy to resolve, one way or another, but I find it rather curious: as the submitted testcase explains, we reject the trivial: enum E { V }; using E::V; because "'E' is not a namespace", but I don't see anything in C++11 explicitly outlawing enums. In fact, curren