On 10/31/2013 03:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
... I understand that at this point likely this isn't 4.9 material anymore.
I think it's fine for 4.9, we're still in stage 1.
The revised patch is OK.
Jason
... I understand that at this point likely this isn't 4.9 material anymore.
Just wanted to add that in the meanwhile I noticed that my WIP patch
fixes c++/56037 too, which in fact seems to me a slightly less uncommon
kind of code and that I tidied a bit the comments and simplified the
cp_parse
Hi,
I'm having a look at this very old parsing issue. We reject things like:
struct S { void operator () (); };
void foo ()
{
( S()() );
}
because the parenthesized S()() triggers an hard error from groktypename
as called at the end of cp_parser_type_id (called by
cp_parser_cast_expression
