On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:42 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Andy Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and
>> committed:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
>
> Have you sent in your copyright assignme
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Andy Gibbs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
Have you sent in your copyright assignment papers to the FSF? The patch
is large enough to need them.
--
Jose
On Friday, October 21, 2011 12:04 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> What's the motivation for this? Why can't it be implemented using C++
> features such as templates and specialization?
Sorry for the delay in my reply.
The motivation, simply put, is to be able to create both templates and
macros t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
>
> The patch is to implement the C built-in function __builtin_choose_expr(...)
> in C++.
>
> I'm afr
Hi,
Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
The patch is to implement the C built-in function __builtin_choose_expr(...)
in C++.
I'm afraid I am new to contributing to GCC, so I hope I am going about thi
