On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
I have just committed. Unfortunately, I have mentioned the wrong PR
number in the ChangeLog. Consequently, Bugzilla isn't quite happy,
shall I adjust the previous commit with the good PR number (51188) ?
Yes, do adjust the ChangeLog. I do this period
2011/11/18 Jason Merrill :
> On 11/18/2011 05:18 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>>
>> +template< size_t, size_t> struct AlignedBuffer;
>> +template< size_t size> struct AlignedBuffer
>> +< size, 8> {
>> +};
>
> This testcase will break on targets where alignof(void*) != 8; just define
> the base tem
On 11/18/2011 05:18 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
+template< size_t, size_t> struct AlignedBuffer;
+template< size_t size> struct AlignedBuffer
+< size, 8> {
+};
This testcase will break on targets where alignof(void*) != 8; just
define the base template and remove the partial specialization.
Hi,
As discussed in the audit trail, here is a patch that fixes this PR
and all its duplicates.
Tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without regressions. OK to commit ?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-11-18 Fabien Chêne
PR c++/51188
* g++.dg/lookup/using46.C: New.
* g++.dg/lo
