Hi,
On 04/11/2017 23:37, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
I had included to get the definition of macro PRId64. I
have now modified the test case to remove all includes. I have added
the definition of the macro in the test case and also added
declarations of functions sprintf() strcmp(). I have attached
On 11/3/2017 7:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 02/11/2017 15:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
This is a good suggestion. I have attached the revised patch. Thanks.
OK, thanks!
Thanks Jason.
I was about to volunteer committing the patch but then noticed that
the testcase includes quite a lot, e
Hi,
On 02/11/2017 15:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
This is a good suggestion. I have attached the revised patch. Thanks.
OK, thanks!
Thanks Jason.
I was about to volunteer committing the patch but then noticed that the
testcase includes quite a lot, eg, too, which we never
include in the whol
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
> On 11/1/2017 1:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mukesh Kapoor
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2017 6:44 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> On 10/25/2017 12
On 11/1/2017 1:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mukesh Kapoor
wrote:
On 10/25/2017 6:44 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end wil
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mukesh Kapoor
wrote:
> On 10/25/2017 6:44 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
>>
>> On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
>>>
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be
difficult becau
On 10/25/2017 6:44 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be
difficult because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I
think the difficulty of fi
On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be
difficult because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I
think the difficulty of fixing this bug comes because of the
requireme
On 10/25/2017 9:06 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be difficult
because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I think the
diffic
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be difficult
>> because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I think the
>> difficulty of fixing this bug comes becaus
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be
difficult because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I
think the difficulty of fixing this bug comes because of the requirement
to maintain backward compatibility with the
On 10/24/2017 7:05 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/20/2017 11:00 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/20/2017 10:45 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/20/2017 12:37 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
> On 10/20/2017 11:00 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
>> On 10/20/2017 10:45 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2017 12:37 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955.
Handle user-def
On 10/20/2017 11:00 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/20/2017 10:45 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/20/2017 12:37 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955.
Handle user-defined literals correctly in lex_string(). An empty
string follo
Hi,
On 10/20/2017 10:45 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/20/2017 12:37 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955.
Handle user-defined literals correctly in lex_string(). An empty
string followed by an identifier is
a valid user-defined li
On 10/20/2017 12:37 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955.
Handle user-defined literals correctly in lex_string(). An empty string
followed by an identifier is
a valid user-defined literal. Don't issue a warning for this case.
a) why
Hi,
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955.
Handle user-defined literals correctly in lex_string(). An empty string
followed by an identifier is
a valid user-defined literal. Don't issue a warning for this case.
Bootstrapped and tested with 'make check' on x86_64-l
17 matches
Mail list logo
