On 05/23/2016 11:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 23/05/2016 15:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/22/2016 02:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
finally sending a patch for this issue. As noticed by submitter himself,
it appears to boil down to a rather straightforward case of not
rejecting unexpanded param
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 15:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/22/2016 02:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
finally sending a patch for this issue. As noticed by submitter himself,
it appears to boil down to a rather straightforward case of not
rejecting unexpanded parameter packs in default arguments. In order
On 05/22/2016 02:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
finally sending a patch for this issue. As noticed by submitter himself,
it appears to boil down to a rather straightforward case of not
rejecting unexpanded parameter packs in default arguments. In order to
handle all the combinations (in/out of class
Hi,
finally sending a patch for this issue. As noticed by submitter himself,
it appears to boil down to a rather straightforward case of not
rejecting unexpanded parameter packs in default arguments. In order to
handle all the combinations (in/out of class, template
parameter/function paramet
