On 12/27/2014 11:49 AM, Momchil Velikov wrote:
struct C {
C(const C &);
};
struct X {
operator C() const;
};
C a{X()};
The variable "a" is initialised by direct list-initialization
according to 8.5.4. [dcl.init.list] #3 and 13.3.1.7 [over.match.list].
As the class C does not have
Hi,
On 12/27/2014 05:49 PM, Momchil Velikov wrote:
+conversion in the context of list-initialisation. */
Nit: I think you want to spell initialization, with a z, like in the
standard (and all the uses of the expression in our front-end)
Paolo.
Hello,
This patch fixes an issue with C++11 where user-defined conversion is
not properly suppressed in certain cases of list-initialisation.
Consider the example:
--- 8< --
struct C {
C(const C &);
};
struct X {
operator C() const;
};
C a{X()};
--- 8< --
This program i
