Re: [C++ Patch] PR 61489

2014-09-11 Thread Jason Merrill
OK, thanks. Jason

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 61489

2014-09-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 09/11/2014 05:06 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: Do we need a documentation update? I agree. Something like the below would do? Thanks, Paolo. 2014-09-11 Paolo Carlini PR c++/61489 * doc/invoke.texi ([-Wmissing-field-initializers]): Update. /cp 2014-09-11

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 61489

2014-09-11 Thread Jason Merrill
Do we need a documentation update? Jason

[C++ Patch] PR 61489

2014-09-10 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, the bug (Jon, in fact) argues that probably we shouldn't -Wmissing-field-initializers warn for cases like obj11 below (or warn5.C). I noticed that in practice this is also the specific behavior which clang++ implements for their warning with the same name. Tested x86_64-linux. Thanks, P