Hi,
On 02/03/2014 05:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/03/2014 11:52 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Note, anyway, that unfortunately it's pretty easy to construct an ICE on
valid too, which doesn't seem a regression, but should be also looked
at.
struct B { };
template struct A : virtual B
{
A
On 02/03/2014 11:52 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Note, anyway, that unfortunately it's pretty easy to construct an ICE on
valid too, which doesn't seem a regression, but should be also looked at.
struct B { };
template struct A : virtual B
{
A();
A(const A&);
};
template A::A(const A&) = def
On 02/03/2014 05:17 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Use vec_safe_is_empty instead of checking the two representations of
an empty vector separately. OK with that change.
Ah nice. Thanks.
Note, anyway, that unfortunately it's pretty easy to construct an ICE on
valid too, which doesn't seem a regressi
Use vec_safe_is_empty instead of checking the two representations of an
empty vector separately. OK with that change.
Jason
Hi,
in this ICE on invalid regression, after a sensible error message about
the invalid base type we crash in implicit_declare_fn at the gcc_assert:
else if (trivial_p && cxx_dialect >= cxx11
&& (kind == sfk_copy_constructor
|| kind == sfk_move_constructor))
gcc_assert
